FOR SECURITY TEAMS
Theom gives security teams data security posture from inside your stores, tracing every interaction to stop breaches and insider misuse, with assurance your controls hold.
Theom builds your data security posture from inside the store, tying every interaction to the identity behind it, whether a human, a service account, or an AI. It shows who reached your sensitive data, whether they should have, and what they did next. When access crosses a line at the data layer, Theom labels it and the platform stops it; where AI is involved, Theom can block or shape the response inline. Your data never leaves your environment.
THE GAP
Your stack already sees fragments of the problem. The catalog knows what data exists, identity knows who has access, DSPM checks how data is configured but not how it is used, and AI guardrails watch the prompts.
None of them connect the sensitive data, the identity reaching it, what actually happened, and the AI in the workflow at the moment it matters. Theom runs inside the store and ties those together, so risky access is something you see and stop in place, instead of piecing it together after the fact.
KNOW, DECIDE, CATCH, ACT
Most tools answer one. Theom answers all four from inside the platform.
KNOW
Theom’s answer
Classification runs inside the platform on your own compute, on a schedule, through a dedicated read-only identity, and results are written back as tags in your catalog.
DECIDE
Theom’s answer
Grants, roles, group membership, and ownership are reconciled against the classification, so over-broad and inherited grants, dormant privileges, and shared identities surface as findings against named objects, not as a score.
CATCH
Theom’s answer
Observed activity is baselined per identity and joined to classification and ownership, with alerts on first access to a sensitive object, on volume and pattern change, and on reads by identities with no business relationship to the data.
ACT
Theom’s answer
Either the tag drives a native platform control, like row and column policies and masking, or the finding goes to your security team, your ticketing system, and your SIEM.
PROOF OF VALUE
A reasonable first step: pick one production schema that concerns you, run in observability mode for two weeks, and judge the result on what comes back — the sensitive data you did not know was there, who could reach it, and who did.
Book a DemoA bounded subset of production, so the scope stays measured in weeks
About an hour to deploy — objects created, identity granted, first classification running
Success criteria agreed in writing before it starts
One team to work with, and a named owner for the findings on your side
WHAT YOU GET
Follow an access end to end inside the store: this identity reached this data, did this, shared it onward.
Detect misuse, over-permissioned accounts, and impersonation, and act before exposure spreads.
Least-privilege controls applied on the labels Theom maintains, in monitor-only or enforcement mode, on your schedule.
Controls and data stay inside your jurisdiction, so there is no new copy to secure and no lost custody.
Exfiltration is a set of concrete signals, and Theom watches for them where the activity happens.
Bulk export and copy-out, and large interactive downloads
Secrets exposed in query text, and exposed developer credentials
Unmasked sensitive columns, and masking-policy conflicts
Compliance
SOC 2
Certified. Type II, audited annually.
GDPR
Supported. EU data protection.
EU AI Act
Supported. Conformity aligned.
Theom is building the foundation for how enterprises will secure data in the age of AI.
Theom ties every interaction inside the store to the identity behind it and baselines normal usage. When an account reaches data it should not, over-reaches its privileges, or behaves like an impersonation, Theom surfaces it, and at the data layer the platform can stop it on the label Theom sets.
No. Theom runs inside your own data stores, so both the data and the controls over it stay in your jurisdiction. There is no external copy to secure and no lost custody, which is exactly why it fits regulated enterprises that cannot let data leave.
Yes. Theom can run in a monitor-only mode that surfaces risk without changing anything, so you can baseline normal access first. When you are ready, you switch to enforcement, and the platform applies least-privilege controls on the labels Theom maintains.
Theom produces a continuous, identity-aware record of who accessed what data and how, so auditors get evidence on demand rather than reconstructed reports. That record supports obligations like GDPR and the EU AI Act. Theom holds a SOC 2 Type II report, available under NDA.
Yes. Theom ties AI activity to identity the same way it does human access, covering both connected agents that reach in through credentials and headless agents running inside the store. It can shape or limit what an AI returns based on the data underneath.
DETECTION COVERAGE
Theom maps its detections to industry frameworks, so you can judge breadth at review time instead of reading through a full rule list. See coverage at the framework level, plus a handful of distinctive detections that show where Theom goes further.
See Security & Trust
MITRE ATT&CKMITRE ATT&CK — 64 detections across Snowflake and Databricks, mapped to the enterprise matrix, with named tactic coverage across Initial Access, Reconnaissance, Collection, Defense Evasion, and Exfiltration.
CIS BenchmarksCIS Benchmarks — 101 controls: 65 against Databricks, 36 against Snowflake.
Distinctive detectionsSix detections that come from watching inside the store, where the query, the identity, and the data are all visible at once:
We will show you real access inside your own stores, with nothing moved out.
Book a Demo
